Talk:Church

new name

It looks like the things talked about over at Talk:Water pantheon are going to go through, in which case, this page should probably be renamed. I like 'bell tower'. Do you? Mordikai wartwunson (talk) 23:34, May 12, 2013 (UTC)

Well, what about the location indicates a tower? Otherwise, yeah, bell something is definitely a good idea. Anteroinen1 (talk) 00:56, May 13, 2013 (UTC)

It's two rooms wide and has sunlight streaming in from above, implying that it's narrow and possibly quite tall; you know, tower-shaped. Mordikai wartwunson (talk) 06:14, May 13, 2013 (UTC)

Scratch that. I think "belfry" would be an even better name. A belfry is a structure that contains a bell and is usually, but not always, part of a tower or steeple. Mordikai wartwunson (talk) 06:14, May 13, 2013 (UTC)

Sounds nice to me. Anteroinen1 (talk) 12:55, May 13, 2013 (UTC)

I disapprove the name changes on the Sub8 locations. They were perfectly fine as they were before; these new names are bland and uninspired. What are we going to name them? "The Church, The Forest, The Sewers (again), The Bellfry (very unpleasant name), The Town"? I say leave the names as they are. Even if the old page names still redirect to these new names, you can just skip them over when looking through a list; they're ordinary in every single way. Unless Mateusz himself complains about the actual names, I don't see any reason to change the names. Just because of a soundtrack name? People these days, I say. -NeroZero-BR (talk) 00:22, May 15, 2013 (UTC)

What is so unpleasant about "belfry"? Do you have a better suggestion? If you have any thoughts on the Sub8 locations' names, put them up on the appropriate pages and I'll respond to them there. Mordikai wartwunson (talk) 00:44, May 15, 2013 (UTC)

Bellfry sounds like a sort of fried egg recipe.

Random, I know, but still.

-NeroZero-BR (talk) 16:44, May 15, 2013 (UTC)

That sounds like an issue between you and the English language. I don't understand why that should have any bearing on whether or not the name gets changed. Mordikai wartwunson (talk) 19:48, May 16, 2013 (UTC)

It's not the problem with the language or anything; it's just that changing the name is pointless. A soundtrack name does not force an area of a game to be called that way; if I had a song called "Pancakes" for a dungeon, the place wouldn't be called "Pancakes". "Church" is a very, very generic term and everything is fine the way it is. Changing the names would cause several arcticle re-structuring through the wikia, and the names we have now are not hurting anyone.

Tl;dr zero reasons to change any names - they're not killing anyone and it's just a minor issue that would just require effort for virtually no enhancements or upgrades at all. Do you see my point? -NeroZero-BR (talk) 16:56, May 17, 2013 (UTC)

I explained my reasons for changing the Sub8 location names over at Talk:Water pantheon. Pretty much all of your concerns have already been addressed in my lengthy post. If you have any rebuttals, please post them over there. Mordikai wartwunson (talk) 00:13, May 18, 2013 (UTC)

I noticed something about the ornaments on the wall in the background, the circle square and triangle clue to 043 or the second tomb, did anyone ever notice this? --Idl3Tinkr (talk) 20:57, March 1, 2020 (UTC)Idl3Tinkr