| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Hmm, I'd say it's an "inter-layers" portal. I don't know how we could define it. |
Hmm, I'd say it's an "inter-layers" portal. I don't know how we could define it. |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| + | |||
| − | How about we rename it to "teleport", and change the defenition to "device or phenomena that transports matter and/or energy between different locations without physically moving them there" or something?[[User:Thomsons Gazelle|Thomsons Gazelle]] ([[User talk:Thomsons Gazelle|talk]]) 17:07, December 23, 2012 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| ⚫ | |||
Revision as of 17:10, 23 December 2012
I would like to remove the Mover from the Portals section since it doesn't seem a Portal to me Danaroth 10:13, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
Sure, go ahead. Marbles! 15:14, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
A "Portal," in its definition, is a gateway, entrance, etc. I'd leave the Temple entrance as "Portal," in that regard, but why Navigator? A Navigator isn't a "gateway," even though it helps lead to other places. I wouldn't call the Navigator a "Portal" is all.
-Rooster
Hmm, I'd say it's an "inter-layers" portal. I don't know how we could define it.
- -- FedericoF talk contribuctions twitter 05:43, December 21, 2012 (UTC)